Bishop Baker: Where Is Christ’s Name?

News: US News Print Friendly and PDF
by David Nussman  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  June 13, 2019   

Bp. Robert Baker notes Christ's name absent from procedures at US bishops' meeting

You are not signed in as a Premium user; we rely on Premium users to support our news reporting. Sign in or Sign up today!

BALTIMORE (ChurchMilitant.com) - During the U.S. bishops' ongoing meeting in Baltimore, one bishop pointed out that Christ's name did not show up in the documents and discussion.

During the General Assembly of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), much of the discussion revolves around policies and procedures. Wednesday afternoon, USCCB President Cdl. Daniel DiNardo yielded the floor to Abp. Allen Vigneron of the Detroit archdiocese to present on the proposed "strategic priorities" and "emphasis areas" for "the 2012–2024 strategic planning cycle."

One of the "strategic priorities" discussed during Abp. Vigneron's slideshow presentation was titled "Protect & Heal God's Children: Restore Integrity, Foster Virtue." Dealing in part with the clerical sex abuse crisis, the slide also included one "emphasis area" bullet point about chastity, which read, "Cultivate an ever-deepening spirituality of chastity and virtue."

While addressing that bullet-point on the floor, Bp. Robert Baker of the Birmingham diocese pointed out that the name of Christ was nowhere to be found in the bullet points and discussion.

"I notice the name 'Jesus Christ' hasn't been mentioned in the course of this," Bp. Baker said, "and Pope Francis has always mentioned that 'missionary discipleship' is an encounter with Christ that leads to all this. It might not hurt to throw that [i.e. Christ's name] in there somewhere."


 

Bishop Baker was alluding to an earlier part of Vigneron's presentation, which used the phrase "joyful band of missionary disciples." This phrase was apparently taken wholesale from the "Unleash the Gospel" campaign that Abp. Vigneron has overseen in his own archdiocese of Detroit.

The Birmingham bishop proposed rewording the bullet point about chastity to add Christ's name, saying, "Perhaps, 'Cultivate an ever-deepening spirituality of chastity and virtue as a result of a personal encounter with Christ,' or something. Hopefully, somewhere His name could be mentioned. Thank you."

Archbishop Vigneron did not respond to the mention of including Our Lord's name. He addressed a more technical point, saying, "Just to get back to the genre that we're dealing with, one of the advantages of having this as an emphasis area is it doesn't just become the work of one committee, but we hold ourselves to the agenda of cross-committee collaboration on all of these areas."

A few moments prior to his remarks on Christ's name, Bp. Baker had referenced a statement on chastity from the National Advisory Council (NAC) — referring to it as "the Nac." It appears Abp. Vigneron was responding to this comment.

I notice the name 'Jesus Christ' hasn't been mentioned in the course of this.

Catholic priest John Stone tweeted about Bp. Baker's call for including Christ's name Wednesday, saying, "This man, Bp. Baker, just stood up and said, 'You know, I haven't heard the name of Jesus Christ mentioned in any of this ... maybe we can add His name in somewhere.'"

One Twitter user replied, "And therein lies the crux of the problem and why all their action items are doomed to failure. It's obvious most bishops in the West no longer believe."

Another account commented, "They run the Church as if it is a corporation, with different resolutions, motions, etc. Run it on your knees praying!"

Wednesday's General Assembly proceedings were rife with discussion of "resolutions, motions" and other bureaucratic-sounding language. 

For instance, when Abp. Vigneron began his presentation, attendees and viewers of the live stream listened to lengthy bureaucratic sayings like the following:

After two consultations with the body of bishops, and one with the National Advisory Council, we've come to the point today where the Committee on Priorities and Plans is ready to fulfill its bylaw-directed task of proposing priorities for the next strategic plan — the one that would guide us through 2021 through 2024 [sic]. And so that's what I'm offering today. I'd like to preface this, my presenting these priorities and emphasis areas, by saying that, throughout our work, we have understood that our task has been to offer, in an ordered and well-articulated form, the results of the three consultations — two with the body of bishops, and one with the National Advisory Council.

And so, these are not the committee recommendations about what the priorities for our conference should be; but rather, these are our formulations of the material we heard from you — from what we heard from the body of bishops, and from what we heard from the National Advisory Council — through the consultations. We have made an effort to see the shapes that are formulated, and to formulate — and to articulate — these, in a way that is sufficiently broad that it will encourage collaboration across all of our committees and offices — whether that's a formal or an informal collaboration. And of course, to say, that these priorities take as a presumption the, uh, the, uh, mandates that are already included in our bylaws.

This represents only about two minutes out of a 90-minute session on Wednesday.

--- Campaign 31868 ---

 

Have a news tip? Submit news to our tip line.


We rely on you to support our news reporting. Please donate today.
By commenting on ChurchMilitant.com you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our comment posting guidelines