Amy Coney Barrett Opposed Roe in Public Ad

News: Campaign 2020US News Print Friendly and PDF
by Christine Niles  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  October 6, 2020   

Also signed letter slamming religious 'assault' of Obamacare

You are not signed in as a Premium user; we rely on Premium users to support our news reporting. Sign in or Sign up today!

SOUTH BEND, Ind. (ChurchMilitant.com) - President Trump's Catholic High Court nominee has signaled her public opposition to abortion and forced coverage of contraception. Before becoming a judge, not only did she add her name to a two-page pro-life ad calling for an end to the "barbaric legacy" of Roe v. Wade, she also signed her name to a letter protesting Obamacare's contraceptive mandate.

Pro-Life Ad

In 2006, Judge Amy Coney Barrett added her name to an ad sponsored by St. Joseph County Right to Life, placed in the South Bend Tribune, calling for an end to Roe v. Wade:

The Supreme Court's 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalized abortion for any reason. Now, after more than thirty-two years under Roe more than 47 million unborn children have been aborted. The majority of those abortions were performed for social reasons. Yet poll after poll continues to show that an increasing majority of Americans are opposed to abortion as a method of birth control. ... It's time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. Wade and restore laws that protect the lives of unborn children.

Since the ad was placed more than a decade ago, the number of abortions has risen to approximately 60 million.

Image
2006 ad placed in South Bend Tribune by St. Joseph County Right to Life

The second page of the ad lists hundreds of names, including that of Barrett and her husband, under the text "We, the following citizens ... oppose abortion on demand and defend the right to life from fertilization to natural death."

Image

Judge Barrett is an originalist in the mold

of her late mentor Justice Antonin Scalia

Barrett was a professor at the University of Notre Dame Law School at the time.

According to the Des Moines Register, Barrett has not responded to queries about the ad. Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein is using it to argue that it raises "serious concerns about whether she [Barrett] would uphold the law."

Feinstein was widely criticized in 2017 for anti-Catholic bigotry.

"[W]hen you read your speeches, the conclusion one draws is that, the dogma lives loudly within you," said the California Democrat to Barrett during confirmation hearings for the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, "and that's of concern when it comes to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for for years in this country."


Barrett repeatedly said during her hearings that she would not allow her personal beliefs to affect her judicial decisionmaking. An originalist in the mold of her mentor, the late Justice Antonin Scalia, Barrett has also made clear in her writings and speeches that personal opinion or preference can never substitute for objective law.

Obama's Contraceptive Mandate

In 2012, Barrett also added her name to a letter sponsored by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty blasting the religious accommodation provided for Obamacare's contraceptive mandate. More than 500 signatories added their names to the letter, titled "Unacceptable," which blasts Obama for requiring that faith-based employers take part — against their will — in a scheme that covers birth control for employees (including abortifacient contraceptives).

Image

The Little Sisters of the Poor fought and won a

legal battle against Obama's contraceptive mandate

"This so-called 'accommodation' changes nothing of moral substance and fails to remove the assault on religious liberty and the rights of conscience which gave rise to the controversy," the letter states. "It is certainly no compromise."

"The simple fact is that the Obama administration is compelling religious people and institutions who are employers to purchase a health insurance contract that provides abortion-inducing drugs, contraception, and sterilization," reads the letter. "This is a grave violation of religious freedom and cannot stand."

This accommodation was litigated by the Little Sisters of the Poor, who won a victory in the Supreme Court in July.

"For over 150 years, the Little Sisters have engaged in faithful service and sacrifice, motivated by a religious calling to surrender all for the sake of their brother," wrote Catholic Justice Clarence Thomas in the majority opinion. "But for the past seven years, they — like many other religious objectors who have participated in the litigation and rulemakings leading up to today’s decision — have had to fight for the ability to continue in their noble work without violating their sincerely held religious beliefs."


2016 talk by then-Professor Amy Coney Barrett on judicial philosophy
 

The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg — whose seat Barrett is being nominated to fill — lamented the ruling.

"Today, for the first time, the Court casts totally aside countervailing rights and interests in its zeal to secure religious rights to the nth degree," she wrote. "Destructive of the Women's Health Amendment, this Court leaves women workers to fend for themselves, to seek contraceptive coverage from sources other than their employer's insurer, and, absent another available source of funding, to pay for contraceptive services out of their own pockets."

The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg — whose seat Barrett is being nominated to fill — lamented the ruling.

Barrett has been critical of Obamacare, charging in a 2017 article that Chief Justice John Roberts engaged in creative writing when he saved Obamacare in the 2012 case NFIB v. Sebelius: He "pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning to save the statute."

"One would be hard-pressed to find many originalists who think that a court should find a way to uphold a statute when determinate text points in the opposite direction," she noted, going on to repeat Scalia's quip that Obamacare should have been renamed "SCOTUScare" after Roberts' decision.

In spite of the president's recent diagnosis, as well as two members of the Senate Judiciary Committee also infected with the Wuhan virus, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said Barrett's confirmation hearings will proceed on Oct. 12, as originally planned. 

If Barrett receives the needed votes, she may preside over a major case set to come before the High Court in November, calling into question the constitutionality of Obamacare.

 

--- Campaign 31877 ---

 

Have a news tip? Submit news to our tip line.


We rely on you to support our news reporting. Please donate today.
By commenting on ChurchMilitant.com you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our comment posting guidelines