Cdl. O’Malley Passes the Buck

by Church Militant  •  •  July 30, 2018   

'This is a squalid and shameless exercise in bureaucratic buck passing'

You are not signed in as a Premium user; you are viewing the free version of this program. Premium users have access to full-length programs with limited commercials and receive a 10% discount in the store! Sign up for only one day for the low cost of $1.99. Click the button below.

After The New York Times reported that Boston's Cdl. Seán O'Malley had been contacted as early as 2015 about former Cdl. Theodore McCarrick's sexual assault of seminarians, O'Malley issued a public statement denying knowledge.

"Recent media reports also have referenced a letter sent to me from Rev. Boniface Ramsey, O.P. in June of 2015, which I did not personally receive," O'Malley stated. "In keeping with the practice for matters concerning the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, at the staff level the letter was reviewed and determined that the matters presented did not fall under the purview of the Commission or the Archdiocese of Boston, which was shared with Fr. Ramsey in reply."

This is a squalid and shameless exercise in bureaucratic buck passing, shrouded in evasive legalisms and the Clintonian manipulation of language.

C.J. Doyle, head of the Catholic Action League of Massachusetts, had strong words for O'Malley.

"This is a squalid and shameless exercise in bureaucratic buck passing, shrouded in evasive legalisms and the Clintonian manipulation of language," he told Church Militant. "The Cardinal omits mentioning if he was told by Kickham [his secretary, driver and closest aide] of the contents of the letter."

Doyle continued:

We are supposed to believe that when a cardinal who is one of the Pope's closest advisers receive a letter exposing both depraved immorality and the abuse of power and office by another member of the Sacred College, his secretary does not inform him and argues jurisdictional issues to do nothing. Pontius Pilate was more candid than this.

Rod Dreher, writing in the American Conservative, called O'Malley's response "world-class buck-passing," saying, "The fact that his response is to issue a lawyerly denial, and a press release promising that this time, he's going to get serious — it's scarcely credible."

And in a series of tweets, Catholic author Michael Brendan Dougherty wondered just how O'Malley knew.

He also challenged the cardinal to speak less like a bureaucrat and more like a shepherd.

Doyle recommends starting over from the ground up.

"I believe the reform of the hierarchy may require a Napoleonic solution," he said. "The First Consul insisted that the entire French hierarchy resign as a condition of effecting the Concordat restoring Catholicism in France. They should all go."

"Any organization may be afflicted by egregious incidents of personal misconduct," he said. "When that organization is incapable of policing itself, when it is unable or unwilling to punish offenders, when it refuses to expel miscreants, and when it lacks the will to reform its corporate culture, then the institution is itself corrupt. Such is the case with American Catholicism today."

Watch the panel discuss institutional corruption in The Download—Complicit Cardinals.


Have a news tip? Submit news to our tip line.

We rely on you to support our news reporting. Please donate today.

Comments are available for Premium members only - please login or sign up. Please see terms and conditions for commenting.