Can We Learn From Donald Trump’s Critics, Even His Enemies? (Part I)

News: Commentary Print Friendly and PDF
by John Zmirak  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  February 22, 2021   

Consider who they are

You are not signed in as a Premium user; we rely on Premium users to support our news reporting. Sign in or Sign up today!

Here's a question I've long sought the proper moment to ask: What can we learn from Donald Trump's critics?

But first, I need to narrow this down quite a bit. We can learn very different things, depending on which critics we mean. Whatever we think of the various groups and spokesmen who have chimed in critiquing Mr. Trump, I think we really can learn something useful from each.

Consider the Liars of the Field

Yes, we can learn from those who were lying. (See "Russia-gate" and the "very fine people" hoax.) The liars teach us how the Left does its dirty work and how its media echo chamber amplifies their slanders. We must learn how best to counter programmatic disinformation, even though most means of communication have been stripped away from us.

And the Professional Sepulcher Whiteners

We can also learn a lot from those who hated Trump and us, his voters, on a tribal, visceral level; who used his policies as pretexts and damned him for things they shrugged at when other leaders did them. We must doggedly expose their moral double standards, of course. But we must also see the limited usefulness of engaging at great length with hypocrites.

Jesus would sometimes debate the Pharisees and Sadducees, though He could read their hearts and motives. At other times, He'd do the important work of exposing and discrediting them for the benefit of the well-meaning but credulous. We must learn the difference between cheap shot ad hominem arguments and legitimate critiques of a public figure's character, as disclosed in his words and deeds. The first is a logical fallacy. The latter? It's a perfectly legitimate mode of discernment we engage in every day.

We can also learn a lot from those who hated Trump and us — his voters — on a tribal, visceral level.

For instance, if you reliably learn that your future brain surgeon or your kids' current school bus driver is a shaky alcoholic or that a given pastor is prone to covering up sex scandals — those aren't ad hominem arguments. Where "Can I trust this person?" is crucial to any decision, facts that tell you about his integrity don't amount to sinful gossip. They're vital (perhaps even soul-saving) data. The victims of clerical sex abuse will testify to that. 

The Hive and Its Drones

We can even learn from those within the conservative movement or within our churches who tossed one core principle they'd treasured after another onto the dumpster fire just to hurt a man whom they envied or sniffed at with class disdain or opposed because The Hive sent them little pheromone signals.

Read the rest at The Stream.

John Zmirak is a senior editor at The Stream, and author or co-author of 10 books, including The Politically Incorrect Guide to Immigration and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Catholicism. He is co-author with Jason Jones of "God, Guns, & the Government."
--- Campaign 32075 ---

 

Have a news tip? Submit news to our tip line.


We rely on you to support our news reporting. Please donate today.
By commenting on ChurchMilitant.com you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our comment posting guidelines