Court Rules Against Baltimore City — Again

News: US News
by Christine Niles  •  •  October 20, 2021   

Denies city's request to block rally plans

You are not signed in as a Premium user; you are viewing the free version of this program. Premium users have access to full-length programs with limited commercials and receive a 10% discount in the store! Sign up for only one day for the low cost of $1.99. Click the button below.

BALTIMORE ( - In yet another blow to the city of Baltimore, a federal judge has once again ruled in Church Militant's favor.

Judge Ellen Hollander of the U.S. District Court of Maryland issued an order Wednesday morning rejecting the city's request to continue blocking St. Michael's plans for the "Bishops: Enough Is Enough" prayer rally and protest.


Baltimore City Attorney Renita Collins

"It comes to me as no surprise that the Court denied this," said St. Michael's Attorney Marc Randazza in response to the court decision. "It does come to me as a surprise that the City's attorneys are representing SMG, too — yet they sought an injunction against their own client."

SMG manages the MECU Pavilion on Baltimore's Inner Harbor, where St. Michael's had originally scheduled the Nov. 16 rally. The city claims SMG is an independent, private third party, even as city attorneys serve as their legal representatives in this litigation and appear to be acting against SMG's interests.

"Further, it seems that Judge Hollander is seeing how unreasonable the City is behaving," Randazza continued. "When St. Michael's offered terms that would fully protect and insulate SMG, why is the City still interfering?"

City attorneys Renita Collins and Hannah Marie Sheehan had previously argued that if the judge did not grant their request to block SMG and St. Michael's from continuing with their contract, the city would suffer "irreparable harm," while St. Michael's would encounter only minor inconveniences by being forced to wait several weeks to continue plans for the rally.

The court disagreed.

Defendants could run out the clock by obtaining a stay.

"[D]efendants could run out the clock by obtaining a stay, with no decision by the Fourth Circuit in time for the rally," Hollander wrote, adding:

And, November 16, 2021, is less than one month away. A stay pending a ruling by the Fourth Circuit — on some unknown date — could easily mean that the rally could not go forward, even if plaintiff were to prevail. A decision favorable to plaintiff could come too late to undo the stay.

She continued, "As described to the Court, the rally is a complicated undertaking, with many moving pieces, participants and costs."

MECU Pavilion

"I cannot agree with defendants that the injury to St. Michael's from a stay would be as minor as they suggest," the judge noted. "To the contrary, it appears to me that the continuing burden to St. Michael's from not yet having a signed contract with SMG is substantial and increasing with each passing day."

Underscoring the point, she added, "There is a pronounced risk that, if the signing of a contract is pushed to the last minute, the ability of St. Michael's to host its rally will be seriously harmed."

Wednesday's decision is the second time the court has ruled in St. Michael's favor. Judge Hollander granted this apostolate's motion for preliminary injunction on Oct. 12, issuing an 86-page memorandum finding the city had violated St. Michael's First Amendment right to free speech.

A separate lawsuit filed by St. Michael's against the city remains ongoing in the district court.

Conflict of Interest

Unresolved issues remain, including not only the precise status of the Nov. 16 rally, but also the glaring conflict of interest mentioned above involving the city's representation of SMG while apparently working against SMG's interests, trying to prevent SMG from continuing talks with St. Michael's.

"The Plaintiff has argued, ad nauseum, that this is a conflict," Randazza noted in his Oct. 18 motion opposing the city

Judge Hollander acknowledged in Wednesday's order she has not formally decided the matter: "To be clear, the Court has made no such ruling on this issue."

Baltimore City Solicitor James Shea

Other apparent conflicts also exist between City Solicitor James Shea's close ties to the U.S. bishops and Shea's decision to quash a rally critical of the bishops' corruption.

Not only are the U.S. bishops, the Maryland Catholic Conference and the archdiocese of Baltimore clients of Venable law firm, where Shea is chairman emeritus and a managing partner, thus technically making them his clients, Shea used his public office as city solicitor to okay $2.3 million to the archdiocese and the bishops, via Catholic Charities.

His law firm also argued on behalf of Maryland's bishops against a 2019 bill proposed by lawmakers to make it easier for sex abuse victims to sue the Church.

Shea donates to the archdiocese of Baltimore, and was a bronze sponsor of the 2017 Baltimore archdiocese gala. A partner at his law firm also sits on the archdiocesan school board.

Read the court memorandum below.

Donations made via this form will be used in preference for our legal fees against the city of Baltimore. Excess donations will be used for general expenses.


Have a news tip? Submit news to our tip line.

We rely on you to support our news reporting. Please donate today.

Comments are available for Premium members only - please login or sign up. Please see terms and conditions for commenting.