Eternal Consequences

News: Commentary
by Church Militant  •  •  December 14, 2016   

Liberal interpretations of "Amoris Laetitia" stem from loss of belief in Hell

You are not signed in as a Premium user; we rely on Premium users to support our news reporting. Sign in or Sign up today!

Bishops are clashing over ways to interpret "Amoris Laetitia," with some claiming it can only be read in light of Tradition, reaffirming Church teaching that those living in an objective state of adultery cannot receive Holy Communion, while others, like Bp. Robert McElroy of San Diego, California claiming it allows divorced and civilly remarried couples to determine for themselves, based on their conscience, whether to receive.

At bottom, those promoting liberal interpretations of the Pope's apostolic exhortation think little of the eternal consequences for the soul receiving the Eucharist in mortal sin — an act that both profanes the Sacrament (a sacrilege) and brings damnation on the soul. Pastors who truly believed this would never counsel couples in invalid unions to approach for Holy Communion.

Watch the panel discuss the loss of belief in Hell and how it's leading to widespread dissent on Church teaching with regard to Holy Communion in "The Download—Eternal Consequences."


Have a news tip? Submit news to our tip line.

We rely on you to support our news reporting. Please donate today.
By commenting on you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our comment posting guidelines