SF Holds Hearing Over Abp. Cordileone Morality Clauses

by Church Militant  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  July 24, 2015   

"People have their rights"

You are not signed in as a Premium user; you are viewing the free version of this program. Premium users have access to full-length programs with limited commercials and receive a 10% discount in the store! Sign up for only one day for the low cost of $1.99. Click the button below.

The secular war against San Francisco Archbishop Cordileone continued Thursday with the city holding a California State Assembly judiciary hearing that argued over the legality of Cordileone's making teachers working at four diocesan high schools sign "morality clauses" classifying them as ministers who must uphold Catholic teaching regarding same-sex "marriage," homosexuality, contraception and artificial insemination in the classroom as well as in their private lives.

Kathleen Purcell, a constitutional lawyer representing sides opposed to the morality clauses, argued that since the San Francisco archdiocese follows a curriculum approved by the state, actively recruits non-Catholic students, has promised not to proselytize and receives accreditation from the University of California — requirng them to teach "objectively about religion" — then religious freedom does not protect them from classifying teachers as ministers.

Purcell argued that San Francisco's "Catholic schools have entered the public square" and must "decide who they are" before they impose morality clauses, characterizing the archdicocese as schizophrenic by defining themselves as a religious institution passing the Catholic faith onto students on the one hand and adhering to state standards of education while welcoming students of all faiths on the other.

"They want it all," Purcell said of the archdiocese.

Purcell also pointed out that many Catholic schools will actively recruit non-Catholic students while simultaneously reassuring the parents of those students the school will take no further efforts to convert them, so classifying teachers as ministers in this case would be inappropriate.

The judiciary hearing had been requested by Assembly member Phil Ting (D-San Francisco) who felt that Abp. Cordileone's morality clauses could have a negative impact on the four high schools — Archbishop Riordan High School and Sacred Heart Cathedral Preparatory in San Francisco, Marin Catholic High School in Kentfield and Junipero Serra High School in San Mateo — calling them "extremely prestigious" with "a history of graduating many leaders in the Bay Area and California."

Arguing alongside Purcell was Leslie Griffin, a law professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, who characterized Cordileone's classification as a "silver bullet" for employers on account of its being too much of a "big exception" for them to avoid discrimination laws.

Griffin also called it "problematic" to ask teachers to sign contracts that supposedly force them to "give up their constitutional rights," maintaining religious freedom as non-absolute and having limits.

Defending the archdiocese, Jeffrey Berman, an attorney with Seyfarth Shaw in Los Angeles, countered the assertion that classifying teachers as ministers was too big of an exception, saying, "It's just another exemption" and that minister classification applies to all sorts of professions, including administrators, kosher cooks and choir directors.

"Teachers qualify because they are role models in fulfilling the religious mission of the school," said Berman.

Attorney Michael Blacher of the firm Liebert Cassidy Whitmore echoed Berman's arguments, saying many of the religious schools he represents (Christian, Islamic, Jewish) have an intended mission to promote their faith, and they intentionally hire teachers who can help them carry out the task.

"One refrain I keep hearing [from the schools] is how fortunate they are to live in a country that protects their religious freedoms," Blacher addded.

Keeping in line with Purcell's assertion that these Catholics don't actually perform their intended function of passing on the Faith, Mark Stone (D-Monterey Bay), chairman of the judiciary committee, asked if the morality clauses were being "arbitrarily enforced," considering the schools were following state educational guidelines while requiring teachers to adhere to Catholic teaching in their private lives.

Berman offered zero apologetics to Stone's assertions, saying that religious institutions have gone so far as to forego government funds when Church and State clash.

"My clients anguish over these decisions," Berman said.

The hearing concluded with Assembly member Ting hoping that a compromise be struck between the two parties.

"We don't believe when you enter these schools you leave part of yourself at the door," said Ting. "I think we want to make sure that all the rights we have fought for are continued. We're trying to strike a balance and be respectful of religious institutions, but people have their rights."


Have a news tip? Submit news to our tip line.

We rely on you to support our news reporting. Please donate today.

Comments are available for Premium members only - please login or sign up. Please see terms and conditions for commenting.