You are not signed in as a Premium user; you are viewing the free version of this program. Premium users have access to full-length programs with limited commercials and receive a 10% discount in the store! Sign up for only one day for the low cost of $1.99. Click the button below.

Jane Roe: Unanswered Questions

Debate over Norma McCorvey’s legacy

May 22, 2020  0

A new documentary portrays the late Norma McCorvey — previously the Jane Roe in Roe v. Wade — as insincere in her pro-life advocacy.

While pro-abortion activists and pro-lifers argue over the film’s implications, important details remain unknown — details that could radically alter the narrative.

The movie, AKA Jane Roe, was filmed in the months leading up to McCorvey’s death in February 2017. 

Reports have highlighted comments she makes in the film that appear to reject the pro-life position, such as, "If a young woman wants to have an abortion — fine. That’s no skin off my ass. You know, that's why they call it 'choice.' It's your choice."

Publicity around the film makes it seem like McCorvey was only pro-life for the money — in the form of donations, speaking gigs and so on.

But pro-life leaders are pushing back, and those who knew McCorvey believe the filmmakers manipulated her and took her comments out of context.

Operation Rescue president Troy Newman stated, "The FX movie does not portray the real Norma McCorvey, who I knew well and called my friend. I saw her in unguarded moments and can verify she was 100% pro-life."

Even with the responses from pro-life leadership, questions remain about the film and McCorvey's legacy.

For instance, filmmaker Nick Sweeney said in a recent interview "Norma wasn't paid to participate in the documentary."

In contrast, Fr. Frank Pavone of Priests for Life (who helped McCorvey convert to Catholicism) has shared screenshots of text messages from McCorvey — messages that talk about charging the filmmakers money for her time on camera.

Debate over the film’s allegations is far from over. But for the time being, it's unclear how to square the contradictory claims and pieces of evidence to make sense of this controversy.

By commenting on you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our comment posting guidelines

Loading Comments


Never miss a Vortex!

Search The Site

Previous Episode
Viganò Vindicated
German political scientist warns of new world order post-Wuhan
May 22, 2020
Subscribe to the Vortex audio podcast

Latest Shows

The Vortex
An Old Demonic Tactic to Strangle Human Political Orders
When they take the reins, there's not much left.
September 29, 2023
The Download
God's Ultimate Warrior
St. Michael the Archangel: our defender and advocate.
September 29, 2023
rome dispatch
Abuse Victims March in Rome Demanding 'Zero Tolerance'
Clerical sex abuse survivors want Pope Francis to take action.
September 29, 2023
The Michael Voris Show
'America Conquered'
Compliments of the Democrats.
September 29, 2023
Forward Boldly
Spicy Talk on Modesty
Debunking myths about Catholic teaching.
September 28, 2023
September 29, 2023
Get briefed on today's top stories with Bradley Eli.
September 29, 2023
Mic’d Up
Apple and Big Tech Shill for Climate Change
Relentlessly pushing the myth.
September 24, 2023
Strickland Speaks
The Bishop of Tyler, TX, Talks to Terry Barber
September 26, 2023